The humanist global objective

From its modern incarnation in the 1933 Humanist Manifesto, humanism has included globalism in its agenda, as stated explicitly in its fourteenth credo:

“FOURTEENTH: The humanists are firmly convinced that existing acquisitive and profit-motivated society has shown itself inadequate and that a radical change in methods, controls, and motives must be instituted. A socialized and cooperative economic order must be established to the end that the equitable distribution of the means of life be possible. The goal of humanism is a free and universal society in which people voluntarily and intelligently cooperate for the common good. Humanists demand a shared life in a shared world.”

Furthermore, as also noted in this credo, the form of this world government is to be socialist.

A prerequisite objective of this plan is to establish a docile population dependent on government and subject to coercion by the threat of the withdrawal of government handouts. Its realization has been and continues to be orchestrated by societies of elite individuals in positions of leadership and wealth who are capable of influencing to their ends activities in the governmental, social and corporate spheres. The social sphere includes religion and education; the corporate sphere embraces the manufacturing, service and banking industries.

Elements of the humanist agenda had influenced the affairs of nations, including the United States, earlier than its formal presentation in the 1933 manifesto. Certain members of Congress, acting in secret and in concert with multinational banking interests, established the Federal Reserve system in America over the Christmas Holiday of 1913-14. This event took America’s financial system out of the hands of the public and under the control of a supranational elite, with considerable negative impact on the financial welfare of the average American citizen. One highly-visible but under-publicized effect of this situation has been the constant erosion of privately-held property, disenfranchising citizens them from their lands and houses and emplacing them in apartments or substandard housing blocks within large cities. Many such large-scale transfers have created ghettos whose occupants suffer under substandard living conditions. The 2009 depression added a new and large crop of humans to these ghettos, with a new boost: punitive property taxation coupled with a legal environment hostile to property ownership, which is contributing yet more to the disenfranchisement of succeeding generations. Beyond those factors is the new, false allure of reverse mortgages, another incentive to break the chain of inheritance. This transformation to a ghetto society is abetted by the policies of the current administration, which, while creating a hostile environment for job creation and property ownership, promises handouts and government support for those who are unemployed or under-employed.

By no means is the United States alone in this transformation. The European nations had central banking first, and they are farther along than America in the integration into society and governance of all of humanism’s objectives. If that’s possible, God is less relevant to the other developed nations than to America, and much closer to the unforeseen peril of Islamic takeover, which itself eventually will lead to harsher, more intrusive government control.

Nationalism is further undercut throughout the world by the emergence of multinational corporate structures, supported by the surreptitious, self-serving and thoroughly corrupt enactment of laws favoring the abandonment of national patriotism within the business sector. This situation has been and can be applied selectively to local areas to bust union activity and inhibit the accumulation of wealth within the already-disenfranchised citizenry.

There is no greater impetus to the formation of a global government than the desire, even lust, for such a system on the part of a group of individuals who possess the means to bring it to pass. There are a number of interlocked non-governmental institutions (NGOs), once blanketed in secrecy but now recognized by the general public and fairly open about their objective. These include The Council on Foreign Relations and the Bilderberg Group, in which numerous current and former heads of state and upper-echelon leaders of government and industry have participated for many years. America has been well-represented in these groups. Collectively, they represent enormous wealth and power.

For public consumption, they argue for world governance on the basis of necessity: according to their published studies, the world is rapidly approaching an abyss of non-sustainability created by man’s lack of stewardship. This cliff includes a deteriorating environment with increasing pollution, species die-offs, and trash-filled landscapes. Besides the environmental issue, there’s also, according to them, the overpopulation situation with its strain on resources, made worse by the demands of multiple nations emerging into developed-nation status. To top it off, there’s evidence, they say, that man’s heavy footprint on the planet is responsible for global warming leading to a possible out-of-control thermal runaway.

Some of these issues may be valid. Others are baseless hype. The recent expose of environmental scientists having cooked the books on global warming lead one to suspect that this issue may be overstated. Regardless of whether the environmental concerns are generally correct or not, God has identified the real motivating factor behind the desire for world government as simple greed. These members of the various NGOs working toward the implementation of this governmental entity perceive themselves as key members of that new government, and as such are in line to receive the personal benefits of their participation.

A good example of the personality involved in this push for a one-world government is the supremely wealthy and powerful financier Gyorgy Schwartz, a.k.a. George Soros. Having demonstrated his sociopathic personality at a young age in his homeland of Hungary in World War II by happily stripping his fellow Jews of their valuables on behalf of the Third Reich. As he accumulated wealth in New York through ruthless currency speculation, he went on to pull the wings off bigger flies, bringing entire countries to their knees. His achievements, according to investigator Steve Croft, include the economic disruption, and in some cases destruction of Yugoslavia, Georgia, Ukraine, and Burma.

Recently, he has set his parasitic sights on the United States as the most stubborn roadblock to world governance. Consequently, he was a powerful force in the installation of a president to his liking, a puppet who would obey him to the letter in pursuing those fundamental changes to our economy and system of government that would accomplish the disruption of and eventual dismantling of the United States as a constitutional republic.

Is Soros, then, the antichrist? He certainly possesses some impressive credentials toward that identification, but then at this particular point in time we seem to have an abundance of candidates. Ahmadinijad of Iran is a serious contender, as is Putin of Russia. Also-rans include the Castros of Cuba and Chavez of Venezuela and, of course, a host of past and current African demagogues. Even the venerable Henry Kissinger is still in the game. In His Olivet Discourse, Matthew 24:24 Jesus spoke of multiple antichrist types:

“For there shall arise false Christs, and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch that, if it were possible, they shall deceive the very elect.”

Several New Testament writers noted the same, John in particular implying that numerous antichrists would rise up throughout the Church Age. His warning in 1 John 1:18 highlights this burden on the shoulders of all Christians throughout time:

“Little children, it is the last time; and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists, by which we know it is the last time.”

As will be discussed later, there is sufficient information about the antichrist in Daniel 7, 9 and 11, and Matthew 24 and Revelation 13-17 to make a positive identification when this man of evil arrives on the scene. Until then we can only speculate and wait, perhaps hope for an early rapture, and watch. There is another man, Barack Obama, who merits a close watch. If he wasn’t such a lackey to others who are more important and powerful than he is, he’d make a more serious candidate for the title of the antichrist. But perhaps, as he gains power and assurance, he will become more his own man. In the meantime, he seems to be doing his best to take his country down.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: